Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBurke, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorConway, Yvonne
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-06T09:07:58Z
dc.date.available2022-04-06T09:07:58Z
dc.date.copyright2022
dc.date.issued2022-03-25
dc.identifier.citationBurke, C., & Conway, Y. (2022). Factors that influence hospital nurses’ escalation of patient care in response to their early warning score: A qualitative evidence synthesis. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 00, 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16233en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://research.thea.ie/handle/20.500.12065/3945
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The Early Warning Score (EWS) is a validated tool that has improved patient outcomes internationally. This scoring system is used within the hospital setting to identify potentially deteriorating patients, thus expediting referral to appropriate medical personnel. It is increasingly recognised that there are other influencing factors along with EWS, which impact on nurses’ decisions to escalate care. AIM: The aim of this review was to identify and synthesise data from qualitative studies, which examined factors influencing nurses’ escalation of care in response to patients’ EWS. METHODS: The systematic search strategy and eligibility criteria were guided by the SPIDER (Sample Phenomenon of Interest Design Evaluation Type of Research) framework. Eleven databases and five grey literature databases were searched. Titles and abstracts were independently screened in line with pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria using the cloud-based platform, Rayyan. The selected studies underwent quality appraisal using CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, 2017, https://www.casp-uk.net/casp-toolschecklists) and subsequently synthesised using Thomas and Harden's thematic analysis approach. GRADE–CERQual (Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation–Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) was used to assess confidence in results. The EQUATOR listed guideline ENTREQ (Tong et al., 2012, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12) was used to synthesise and report findings. RESULTS: Eighteen studies from seven countries including 235 nurses were identified. Following synthesis, four analytical themes were generated with eighteen derived consequent findings. The four themes identified were as follows: 1) Marrying nurses’ clinical judgement with EWS 2) SMART communication 3) EWS Protocol: Blessing and a Curse 5) Hospital Domain. CONCLUSION: Nurses strive to find balance by simultaneously navigating within the boundaries of both the EWS protocol and the hospital domain. They view the EWS as a valid essential component in the system but one that does not give a definitive answer and absolute direction. They value the protocols’ ability to identify deteriorating patients and convey the seriousness of a situation to their multidisciplinary colleagues but also find it somewhat restrictive and frustrating and wish to have credence given to their own intuition and clinical judgement.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Nursingen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectclinical deteriorationen_US
dc.subjectearly warning systemen_US
dc.subjectescalation of careen_US
dc.subjectnurseen_US
dc.subjectqualitative researchen_US
dc.titleFactors that influence hospital nurses’ escalation of patient care in response to their early warning score: A qualitative evidence synthesisen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationSt Johns Hospital Urgent Care Center, St Johns Hospital St Johns Square, Limerick, Irelanden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Nursing, Health Sciences and Integrated Care, Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Galway, Irelanden_US
dc.contributor.sponsorNo sources of funding or sources of support in the form of grants, equipment and drugs were given to the authors in the process of conducting this research.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewyesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jocn.16233en_US
dc.identifier.endpage50en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5053-8237en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8650-2655en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.urlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jocn.16233en_US
dc.identifier.volume00en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International