Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHannigan, Cathy
dc.contributor.otherMcClay, Deirdre
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-26T16:07:57Z
dc.date.available2017-10-26T16:07:57Z
dc.date.issued2016-06-24
dc.identifier.citationHarvard University of Limericken_US
dc.identifier.otherMasters of Arts in Learning and Teaching (Taught)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://research.thea.ie/handle/20.500.12065/2179
dc.description.abstractThis action research took place over ten weeks of laboratory practical work within a Food Microbiology module at Letterkenny Institute of Technology (LYIT). The customary method of assessing laboratory practical work is to mark the student’s laboratory report after each laboratory practical without a transparent marking scheme. The purpose of this research is to investigate if the implementation of a criteria based marking scheme, in the form of a rubric, together with student self-assessment and lecturer feedback, is an effective teaching tool for the enhancement of student learning in the practical element of a Level 7, Food Science degree module. A mixed methods approach was used in this research. Literature themes researched included, rubric-assessment, self-assessment, feedback and assessing laboratory practicals. Data collection methods used included student rubric-based self-assessment sheets, assessment feedback sheets from the lecturer, fourteen questionnaires and three semi structured interviews. Student self-assessment marks were compared with those from the lecturer to plot changes over time. The findings suggest that by repeated use of the rubric, students’ judgements of their marks do converge with the lecturer’s marks. However, the overestimating of marks by students with respect to their achieved laboratory practical marks is remarkable. A significant correlation was found between continuous use of the self-assessment rubric and the marks achieved for their laboratory practical write-up. In future, these findings may be enhanced by supporting the student more rigorously during the self-assessment process with examplars and training in the use of rubrics, self-assessment and feedback. In addition, self-assessment rubrics supported with written lecturer feedback should be considered as an assessment strategy for laboratory based subjects by LYIT.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/*
dc.subjectHumanitiesen_US
dc.subjectstudent rubric-based self-assessmenten_US
dc.subjectwritten feedbacken_US
dc.subjectenhancement of student learningen_US
dc.title‘An investigation into the use of rubric-based self-assessment and written feedback as an effective teaching tool for the enhancement of student learning in the practical element of a food science degree module’.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.publisher.institutionLetterkenny Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rights.accessCreative Commonsen_US
dc.subject.departmentScienceen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland