Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoutier, Maxime
dc.contributor.authorDonohoe, Owen
dc.contributor.authorKopf, R. Keller
dc.contributor.authorHumphries, Paul
dc.contributor.authorBecker, Joy A.
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorVanderplasschen, Alain
dc.identifier.citationBoutier, M., Donohoe, O., Kopf, R. K., Humphries, P., Becker, J.A., Marshall, J., Vanderplasschen, A. (2019). Biocontrol of carp: the Australian plan does not stand up to a rational analysis of safety and efficacy. Frontiers in Microbiology. 10: 882, 1-4. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00882.en_US
dc.identifier.otherArticles - Bioscience Research Institute AITen_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus 57112706100
dc.description.abstractTHE AUSTRALIAN PLAN FOR BIOCONTROL OF INVASIVE CARP USING CYPRINID HERPESVIRUS 3 Common carp (Cyprinus carpio), hereafter referred as carp, is one of the most widely cultured fish produced for food globally. It was introduced into Australia for aquaculture in the mid-nineteenth century (Lintermans, 2004). Following floods in the 1970’s, carp became abundant and widespread in many Australian waterways where it has come to comprise a large proportion of the fish fauna of these ecosystems (Koehn, 2004). To reduce carp population abundance and aid native species recovery, the Australian Government is evaluating the release of cyprinid herpesvirus 3 [CyHV-3, also known as koi herpesvirus (KHV)] presumed to be absent from Australia (NCCP, 2017). CyHV-3 emerged in the mid 1990’s and since that time has devastated carp production worldwide (Boutier et al., 2015). Due to its economic impact on aquaculture, the Word Organization for Animal Health requires notification when the virus is identified.en_US
dc.publisherFrontiers in Microbiologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Microbiologyen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland*
dc.subjectBiological controlen_US
dc.subjectCyprinid herpesvirus 3 (CyHV-3)en_US
dc.subjectInvasive speciesen_US
dc.titleBiocontrol of carp: the Australian plan does not stand up to a rational analysis of safety and efficacy.en_US
dc.description.noteThis article was submitted to Aquatic Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
dc.rights.accessOpen Accessen_US
dc.subject.departmentBioscience Research Instituteen_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland